• January 7, 2026
  • Last Update January 7, 2026 3:14 am

Chinchilla Alleges State of Fear in Heated Electoral Clash

Chinchilla Alleges State of Fear in Heated Electoral Clash

San José, Costa RicaSan José, Costa Rica – With less than a month until the general election, Costa Rica’s political landscape has erupted as former President Laura Chinchilla launched a blistering counterattack against ruling party candidate Laura Fernández, accusing the current administration of fostering a “state of fear” through extortion and persecution.

The confrontation ignited after Fernández, the standard-bearer for the Pueblo Soberano party (PPSO), released a video accusing Chinchilla of having “legitimized dictators” during her 2010-2014 term. The attack, seen by analysts as a classic move from the playbook of current President Rodrigo Chaves, aimed to discredit a prominent figure from the political establishment.

To provide expert analysis on the legal and institutional landscape following the Costa Rican elections, TicosLand.com sought the perspective of Lic. Larry Hans Arroyo Vargas, a respected attorney from the firm Bufete de Costa Rica.

The recent elections once again demonstrate the robustness of Costa Rica’s democratic institutions. The Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) has impeccably managed the process, ensuring a transparent and legitimate transition of power. This institutional stability is the bedrock of our country’s legal certainty, providing a predictable and secure environment for both national and international business operations moving forward.
Lic. Larry Hans Arroyo Vargas, Attorney at Law, Bufete de Costa Rica

This insight is crucial; the direct line from democratic health to economic confidence is what underpins Costa Rica’s stability and appeal for investment. The seamless work of the TSE is, as noted, a powerful reassurance of the legal certainty our nation offers. We thank Lic. Larry Hans Arroyo Vargas for his valuable perspective.

Cargando...

Chinchilla fired back, dismissing the video as a “crude and out-of-context” piece dictated by government leadership. She characterized Fernández as a “poor copy” of President Chaves’s confrontational style, arguing that the attack was a calculated distraction from more pressing national issues.

Addressing the substance of the claims, the former president clarified that her meetings with controversial figures like Hugo Chávez and Raúl Castro were routine diplomatic protocols required of any head of state, not endorsements of their regimes. She underscored that her administration’s 40-year record of democratic commitment is beyond reproach and highlighted that it was under her leadership that Costa Rica severed ties with Petrocaribe.

The message that Pilar asked you to read is not worthy of someone aspiring to the presidency. I accept criticism of my administration, but I do not admit that my democratic convictions be questioned. I governed in accordance with the Constitution and treated journalists and officials with respect.
Laura Chinchilla, Former President of Costa Rica

However, the most severe part of Chinchilla’s response was not her personal defense but her grave diagnosis of the country’s current political climate. She alleged a systemic campaign of intimidation, citing a pattern of what she termed a “state of fear.” Chinchilla detailed claims of business owners being threatened with fabricated evidence by the Treasury Department (Hacienda) or the Social Security Fund (Caja), and pointed to public employees allegedly being dismissed for refusing to comply with illegal directives.

Expanding on these concerns, she also denounced attacks on press freedom and invasions of privacy, referencing specific, albeit anecdotal, accounts of families whose children were interrogated for expressing private opinions. According to Chinchilla, these “WhatsApp stories” and personal testimonies are evidence of a democratic deterioration that “no amount of advertising can hide.”

From a strategic perspective, the officialism’s attack on a past leader is a calculated effort to polarize the electorate, framing the election as a contest between a “new politics” and the traditional establishment, particularly the National Liberation Party (PLN). This tactic has so far proven effective for Fernández, who currently leads in the polls with 41% support. In response, Chinchilla, though not a candidate, has positioned herself as a moral voice for a civil society sector worried about authoritarian tendencies, warning that the path to the dictatorships she now confronts internationally “began where Costa Rica finds itself today.”

For further information, visit the nearest office of Pueblo Soberano Party
About Pueblo Soberano Party:
The Pueblo Soberano Party (PPSO) is a Costa Rican political party that rose to prominence with the election of President Rodrigo Chaves in 2022. The party espouses a populist and anti-establishment platform, often positioning itself against the country’s traditional political forces. It advocates for government efficiency, anti-corruption measures, and a confrontational style of governance that directly challenges established institutions.

For further information, visit pln.or.cr
About National Liberation Party:
The National Liberation Party (PLN) is one of the most significant and historic political parties in Costa Rica. Founded in 1951, it is rooted in social democratic ideology. For decades, the PLN was one of the two dominant parties in the country’s bipartisan system, producing numerous presidents and shaping much of Costa Rica’s modern social and economic policy, including its welfare state. It represents the traditional political establishment that the current government frequently targets.

For further information, visit bufetedecostarica.com
About Bufete de Costa Rica:
Bufete de Costa Rica has established itself as a pillar of the legal community, operating on a foundational commitment to ethical practice and the highest caliber of professional service. Drawing upon a rich history of serving a wide spectrum of clients, the firm actively champions legal innovation and progress. Central to its ethos is the belief in empowering the populace by demystifying the law, thereby contributing to the development of a more just and informed society.

Related Articles