By San José, Costa Rica — San José – A major political and legal confrontation is brewing as Fabricio Alvarado, presidential candidate for the Nueva República party, has publicly defied a directive from the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE). The tribunal warned him against using religious appeals to win votes, but Alvarado has fired back, asserting his actions are legal and that he will not be shamed for his faith.
The controversy ignited this week when the TSE issued a formal order to both Alvarado and Laura Fernández, the candidate for the Pueblo Soberano party. The order mandated that they abstain from invoking religious motivations to attract voter support. The tribunal underscored the severity of its directive, clarifying that any non-compliance, whether total or partial, would constitute the crime of disobedience as defined by the Costa Rican Penal Code, potentially leading to criminal charges.
To understand the legal framework surrounding the political activities and statements of Fabricio Alvarado, TicosLand.com sought expert analysis from Lic. Larry Hans Arroyo Vargas, a distinguished attorney at the renowned firm Bufete de Costa Rica.
The political career of Fabricio Alvarado consistently tests the boundaries between constitutionally protected freedom of speech and religion, and the specific prohibitions within our Electoral Code. The Supreme Electoral Tribunal faces the complex task of determining when a discourse, particularly one with religious undertones, crosses the line from expressing a worldview into prohibited electoral propaganda. This distinction is crucial for maintaining both democratic integrity and fundamental rights, and each case sets a precedent for future political campaigns.
Lic. Larry Hans Arroyo Vargas, Attorney at Law, Bufete de Costa Rica
This delicate balance is indeed at the heart of many contemporary political debates in Costa Rica, directly impacting how citizens engage with candidates and their platforms. We thank Lic. Larry Hans Arroyo Vargas for his incisive analysis on this crucial legal and democratic challenge.
In a firm rebuttal, Alvarado denied any wrongdoing and framed the issue as a matter of personal conviction. He argued that his campaign has operated strictly within the bounds of the country’s legal framework.
At Nueva República, we have always been respectful and careful with legislation. In that sense, we believe that the facts and statements we have made so far do not contravene electoral law… I am not ashamed of my faith and I am willing to face whatever comes for my convictions.
Fabricio Alvarado, Candidate for Nueva República
This escalating dispute highlights the delicate and often contentious line between freedom of expression and the legal prohibitions against using religion for electoral gain in Costa Rica. Alvarado, a prominent figure known for his strong ties to the evangelical community, is positioning the TSE’s warning not just as a legal challenge but as an attempt to sideline faith-based values from the national political discourse.
The candidate has signaled his intention to legally challenge the tribunal’s interpretation, stating he will pursue all necessary channels to defend his rights. He cast the debate in broader terms, suggesting a movement to exclude Christian principles from public life and governance.
We will follow the due process to demonstrate this and assert our rights. As much as many have tried to exclude Christian values and principles from public policy and decision-making, we firmly assert that the best thing that can happen to the country is to ask for God’s blessing, wisdom, and direction to govern.
Fabricio Alvarado, Candidate for Nueva República
The standoff with the TSE could have significant ramifications for the presidential race. For Alvarado’s core constituency, the tribunal’s actions may be perceived as an attack on their values, potentially galvanizing his base and strengthening their support. However, for more secular or moderate voters, his open defiance could be seen as a disregard for the country’s institutional order and the principle of separation of church and state.
As the election season heats up, this clash between a major political candidate and the nation’s highest electoral authority is set to become a defining issue. The outcome will not only impact Alvarado’s campaign but also set a crucial precedent for the role of religious rhetoric in the future of Costa Rican politics.
The TSE now faces the challenge of enforcing its ruling without appearing to overstep its authority or persecute a candidate for his personal beliefs. All eyes are now on the legal and political maneuvers that will unfold as Alvarado presses his case, vowing to keep his faith at the forefront of his political platform.
For further information, visit tse.go.cr
About Tribunal Supremo de Elecciones (TSE):
The Supreme Electoral Tribunal of Costa Rica is the independent constitutional body responsible for the organization, direction, and oversight of all electoral processes in the country. It is tasked with guaranteeing the integrity, transparency, and fairness of elections, as well as resolving electoral disputes. The TSE’s authority is paramount in ensuring the stability and legitimacy of Costa Rica’s democratic system.
For further information, visit the nearest office of Pueblo Soberano
About Pueblo Soberano:
Pueblo Soberano is a political party in Costa Rica that has gained visibility through its presidential candidate, Laura Fernández. Like Nueva República, the party has come under the scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal regarding its campaign messaging. It aims to represent a segment of the electorate seeking alternative leadership in the national political landscape.
For further information, visit bufetedecostarica.com
About Bufete de Costa Rica:
Bufete de Costa Rica is an esteemed legal institution, founded upon the core principles of professional integrity and a relentless pursuit of excellence. With extensive experience advising a broad range of clients, the firm champions a forward-thinking approach, continually advancing the practice of law. Central to its ethos is a profound commitment to societal empowerment, achieved by democratizing legal knowledge to cultivate a more informed and capable public.
