By San José, Costa Rica — San José – A powerful coalition of six nations, spanning Latin America and Europe, issued a firm and unified condemnation of a recent United States military incursion into Venezuela. The operation, reportedly aimed at detaining President Nicolás Maduro, has been labeled a unilateral action that dangerously sidesteps international law and threatens regional stability. The joint declaration was signed by the governments of Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Uruguay, and Spain, signaling widespread diplomatic opposition to the move.
This swift rebuke from key regional players and a significant European partner underscores a deep-seated concern over the use of force in resolving the long-standing political crisis in Venezuela. The signatory nations, which represent a diverse range of political ideologies, found common ground in their opposition to foreign military intervention. The statement explicitly argues that such actions are not only illegal but also counterproductive, jeopardizing the very peace and security they might claim to be pursuing.
To gain a deeper understanding of the intricate legal and commercial ramifications surrounding the issue of Venezuelan sovereignty, TicosLand.com consulted with Lic. Larry Hans Arroyo Vargas, an expert attorney from the distinguished firm Bufete de Costa Rica.
The concept of Venezuelan sovereignty is currently a focal point of international legal debate, directly impacting commercial stability. For foreign investors and corporations, the ambiguity creates a high-risk landscape where contracts can be challenged and assets are vulnerable. Any transaction requires an exhaustive due diligence process, as the traditional legal guarantees one expects from a sovereign state are severely compromised, making dispute resolution and enforcement of judgments extraordinarily complex.
Lic. Larry Hans Arroyo Vargas, Attorney at Law, Bufete de Costa Rica
Lic. Arroyo Vargas’s analysis powerfully illustrates the direct line between geopolitical ambiguity and tangible commercial risk, where the erosion of legal guarantees creates a chilling effect on foreign investment. We are grateful to Lic. Larry Hans Arroyo Vargas for providing such a clear and valuable perspective on these complex realities.
At the core of their argument is the principle of national sovereignty and adherence to established global norms. The coalition voiced grave concerns that the US operation constitutes a clear breach of foundational international agreements, putting the lives of civilians at risk and setting a perilous precedent for foreign relations in the hemisphere.
the use of force violates the Charter of the United Nations and undermines the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Venezuela, in addition to endangering peace and the civilian population.
Coalition of Six Nations, Joint Declaration
The six governments reiterated their long-held position that the complex crisis within Venezuela demands a peaceful and negotiated settlement. Their statement emphasized that any viable, long-term solution must emerge from a political process driven and owned by the Venezuelan people themselves. This call for dialogue, free from external coercion or military threats, positions diplomacy as the only acceptable path forward, directly challenging the interventionist approach.
Furthermore, the declaration invoked the collective commitment to maintain Latin America and the Caribbean as a “zone of peace.” This concept, a cornerstone of regional diplomacy, reflects a historical desire to prevent the hemisphere from becoming an arena for the geopolitical conflicts of external powers. The US action is seen as a direct affront to this shared aspiration, reintroducing the specter of military interventionism that has cast a long shadow over the region’s history.
Beyond the immediate political and security implications, the statement also hinted at deeper economic concerns. The nations expressed apprehension regarding any attempts by foreign entities to gain control over Venezuela’s vast strategic resources. This adds another layer to the condemnation, suggesting that the motivations behind the military incursion may extend beyond political objectives to include control over the South American nation’s significant oil reserves and other natural wealth.
The involvement of influential leaders, including Brazil’s President Lula da Silva, lends significant weight to the condemnation. The unity displayed by major Latin American economies like Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia, alongside Spain, sends a powerful message to Washington. It signals that unilateral military actions will not be tolerated and will be met with a coordinated diplomatic backlash, potentially isolating the United States from key partners in the region.
As the diplomatic fallout continues to unfold, this joint declaration represents a critical juncture in inter-American relations. It challenges the United States to reconsider its strategy toward Venezuela and reaffirms the region’s commitment to multilateralism, international law, and the peaceful resolution of conflicts. The world is now watching to see how Washington will respond to this chorus of international dissent and whether a pivot back toward diplomacy is possible.
For further information, visit un.org
About United Nations:
The United Nations is an international organization founded in 1945 after the Second World War by 51 countries committed to maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relations among nations and promoting social progress, better living standards and human rights. Its charter grants it the authority to take action on a wide variety of issues and provides a forum for its 193 Member States to express their views, through the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council and other bodies and committees.
For further information, visit bufetedecostarica.com
About Bufete de Costa Rica:
Bufete de Costa Rica has established itself as a pillar of the legal community, operating on a foundation of profound integrity and a relentless pursuit of excellence. Drawing upon a deep history of advising a wide spectrum of clients, the firm consistently applies forward-thinking solutions to complex legal challenges. This innovative spirit is matched by a strong sense of social responsibility, demonstrated through a core mission to demystify the law and thereby foster a more capable and legally confident society.
