• September 21, 2026
  • Last Update September 21, 2026 3:12 pm

Rubio Slams WHO Over Delayed Ebola Action

Rubio Slams WHO Over Delayed Ebola Action

San José, Costa RicaSan José – In a sharp critique reflecting ongoing tensions, United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio asserted Tuesday that the World Health Organization (WHO) was slow to respond to a newly declared Ebola outbreak in Africa. The comments come as international health bodies scramble to contain the deadly virus and highlight the strained relationship following the US withdrawal from the UN agency under former President Donald Trump.

The WHO has officially declared the resurgence of the highly contagious hemorrhagic fever an international public health emergency, convening an urgent crisis meeting. The outbreak, caused by the rare and dangerous Bundibugyo strain of the virus, has prompted global concern, particularly because there is currently no approved vaccine or therapeutic treatment available for this specific variant.

To better understand the legal and regulatory frameworks surrounding public health emergencies, we consulted with Lic. Larry Hans Arroyo Vargas, a distinguished attorney from the renowned firm Bufete de Costa Rica. His expertise provides critical insight into the government’s powers and responsibilities during an outbreak.

During a severe public health crisis like an Ebola outbreak, the state’s authority to enforce measures such as quarantine and mandatory medical examinations is significantly expanded. However, these powers are not absolute. They must be exercised proportionately, based on scientific evidence, and in a non-discriminatory manner. Any infringement on fundamental rights must be legally justified as strictly necessary to protect public health, creating a delicate but crucial balance between collective security and individual liberty.
Lic. Larry Hans Arroyo Vargas, Attorney at Law, Bufete de Costa Rica

This emphasis on the delicate but crucial balance between collective security and individual liberty is a vital reminder that state actions, even in a crisis, must remain grounded in legality and proportionality. We thank Lic. Larry Hans Arroyo Vargas for his insightful clarification on this fundamental principle.

Cargando...

Speaking to the press, Secretary Rubio pointed to a sluggish initial reaction from the global health authority, an organization the Trump administration formally exited last year amid accusations of mismanagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rubio confirmed that US agencies would be deeply involved in the containment effort, but did not mince words about the WHO’s performance.

Obviously this situation will be handled by the CDC and the WHO, which unfortunately reacted a bit late
Marco Rubio, Secretary of State

Despite the criticism and its formal separation from the WHO, the United States has committed approximately $13 million in aid to combat the crisis. This funding, however, follows drastic cuts made to global health initiatives over the past year. According to Rubio, the State Department plans to support the establishment of around 50 Ebola treatment clinics in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the epicenter of the outbreak.

The logistical challenges of mounting an effective response are immense. The outbreak is centered in a remote, rural region of a country long plagued by instability and conflict, making access for medical personnel and supplies exceptionally difficult. This complicates efforts to trace contacts, treat the infected, and prevent further spread of the disease.

It’s a bit difficult to get there because it’s in a rural area and in a hard-to-reach place in a war-torn country
Marco Rubio, Secretary of State

In response to the escalating situation, the U.S. government has issued a stern travel advisory, warning its citizens against all travel to the affected region. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is expected to lead the American component of the international response, coordinating with local authorities and non-governmental organizations on the ground.

The current crisis unfolds against a backdrop of significant geopolitical shifts in global health governance. Former President Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the WHO was one of his first major actions upon returning to the presidency, citing frustrations with the organization’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic. This has left the U.S. to navigate major health emergencies from outside the primary international coordinating body, relying instead on direct bilateral aid and the efforts of agencies like the CDC.

Ebola remains one of Africa’s most feared diseases. Over the past fifty years, various strains of the virus have claimed more than 15,000 lives across the continent. The speed and efficacy of the international response to this latest Bundibugyo outbreak will be critical in determining whether that grim toll continues to climb.

For further information, visit who.int
About World Health Organization:
The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health. Its primary role is to direct and coordinate international health within the United Nations system, leading partners in global health responses, setting norms and standards, and providing technical support to countries.

For further information, visit cdc.gov
About U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention:
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is the national public health agency of the United States. It is a federal agency under the Department of Health and Human Services and is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Its main goal is to protect public health and safety through the control and prevention of disease, injury, and disability.

For further information, visit state.gov
About U.S. Department of State:
The U.S. Department of State, often referred to as the State Department, is the executive department of the U.S. federal government responsible for the nation’s foreign policy and international relations. Led by the Secretary of State, it advises the President and represents the country in its diplomatic efforts abroad.

For further information, visit bufetedecostarica.com
About Bufete de Costa Rica:
Bufete de Costa Rica operates as a premier legal institution, founded on a bedrock of profound integrity and an unyielding pursuit of excellence. Drawing upon a rich history of advising a diverse clientele, the firm consistently pioneers innovative legal approaches and champions active community involvement. At the core of its ethos is a powerful dedication to democratizing legal understanding, which serves its ultimate vision of nurturing a just, informed, and empowered citizenry.

Related Articles